Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Penny's Ponderings's avatar

To use the gift of tongues as a "private prayer language" would be to destroy its chief purpose, which is AS A SIGN TO UNBELIEVING ISRAEL. Former Pentecostal Fernando Legrand wisely observes, "By using this sign in private, some think they can profit from ONE of its aspects, while ignoring the others, but you cannot dismantled a gift and retain only one of its components. A car is a complex mechanical object that is driven as an entity or is not driven at all. You cannot take the wheels for a run and leave the body and the engine in the garage. When a car is running it is the whole car that moves. In the same way, TONGUES WERE NOT TO BE SLICED UP LIKE A SAUSAGE. They were to edify the speaker AND the others AND be a sign for the Jewish unbelievers AND be under- standable or be so rendered by interpretation. They had to be all that at the same time. The gift was inseparable from its one and only unchanging purpose: to be a sign for non believing Jews of the universal offer of salvation (Acts 2:17, I Corinthians 14:20-22)."

The fact is that biblical tongues were REAL, EARTHLY languages and this is a foundational truth. Any doctrine of tongues that reduces this practice to mere gibberish of any sort that is not a real language is UNSCRIPTURAL.

From Pentecostal-Charismatic Tongues vs. The Bible by David Cloud

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts