TICK BORN DISEASE / CHLORINE DIOXIDE THE ANSWER for all Tick/ Spider/ Animal Bites. Protocols for Dogs and People -
The BEST way to prevent pathogen transmission to dogs is keep the tick from attaching to begin with. Or in the case of infection - to cure disease with no harm to the animal.
RECAP FROM PART I
In the first segment of this series, we saw how typical topical medications slated to prevent ‘sickness’ from tick bites, are futile - and even dangerous.
The pet meds are sold on the premise that they ‘kill the ticks before transmission occurs’,
At least this is what your vet will tell you.
One method to prevent pathogen transmission to dogs is to kill the ticks before transmission occurs. NIH.gov article
Yet we saw that transmission times for various disease vary wildly (See Part I of this post, or the footnote below). And even when the tick dies, if it is still attached - it is not known if transmission ceases. (And if it is known, it is not published)
And that they are ‘safe for pets’.
Meanwhile the FDA has admitted that the neurotoxic drugs, can cause neurological disease in pets:
In September 2018, the US FDA alerted pet owners and veterinarians that isoxazolines, including afoxolaner, fluralaner (Bravecto), sarolaner, and lotilaner, can have neurologic effects in some dogs, such as muscle tremors, ataxia, and seizures.
Afoxoloner - There is no specific antidote for afoxolaner poisoning in pets. Treatment rests with preventing further exposure and supportive measures. MERK (in other words, there is no treatment; Stop giving the poison is not a treatment).
They can only kill the insect, not the disease:
These medications are ectoparasiticide drugs; That is, they destroy the exoskeleton of an insect. But why do the drug companies call them - “efficacious against Ixodes ricinus, Ixodes scapularis, Dermacentor reticulatus, Dermacentor variabilis, Babesia spp., Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Borrelia burgdorferi sensu latu, and Ehrlichia canis and Rhipicephalus sanguineus” ? [NIH3].
The drugs do not kill bacteria. They only attempt to kill ticks before transmission occurs, at the same time, trying not to kill the host pet - Just like GMO corn, the idea is that the ‘desired’ plant may live - but at what cost to the eater of the plant? .
The drug neurotoxins are designed to enter the bloodstream of a treated animal, which poison somehow remains there for up to 12 weeks. We already see from the FDA - the potential cost the to the health of the pet. What about the generations of offspring of the routinely ‘intoxicated’ animals? (Vets push their credulous clients to re-tox their pet monthly.)
FEARMONGERING
Then the scare tactic to do monthly treatments, sounds a lot like covid vaccines.. suggesting the ‘non medicated dog is a harbor of pathogens, and a harbinger of ill’.
“When monthly treatments are not re-administered in the recommended treatment interval. This puts not only the dog’s health at risk, but poses a risk to other dogs and humans, because an unprotected dog is a potential pathogen reservoir. NIH.GOV
Like I said yesterday, the idea of waiting for a tick to bite, before we act, is like a burglar alarm.. which only alerts you when the guy is breaking the kitchen glass door. My patented security system, (The LIGHT BRIGADE) warns well in advance. Prevention is always worth a ton of cure.